November 1965, Detroit. In the hushed offices of General Motors, one of the world's most powerful industrial empires, someone has just dropped a bombshell. A young, unknown lawyer, Ralph Nader, has just published a book that will shake the foundations of the American automobile industry. The title? "Unsafe at Any Speed." And in the crosshairs, a specific car: the Chevrolet Corvair.
What follows will surpass anything imaginable in terms of corporate warfare . Prostitution, espionage, blackmail... General Motors will mobilize resources worthy of an intelligence agency to destroy a single man. But this small Harvard lawyer will stand up to the giant and change the history of the automobile forever.
{slides}
Today, I'm telling you the story of a David versus Goliath automobile, where a single car brings down an entire system and gives rise to modern road safety laws. A story where the good guys and the bad guys may not be who you think they are...
Detroit's enfant terrible
To understand this case, we must first talk about the star of the scandal: the Chevrolet Corvair . In 1960, when it arrived on the American market, it was a revolution. Imagine: in a country where all cars had their engine in the front, GM dared to release a car with the engine... in the rear! Like a Volkswagen Beetle, but American.
The man behind this audacity is Edward Cole , a brilliant engineer who had just taken the reins at Chevrolet in 1956. Cole was the kind of guy who had been dreaming of rear-engined cars since World War II. A visionary, or a madman, depending on your point of view. And believe me, we'll soon find out which one he was.
Cole surrounded himself with a team of top-notch engineers: Harry Barr, Robert Schilling, Kai Hansen, and Frank Winchell. Names that may not ring a bell, but in the automotive world, they were the cream of the crop. These guys knew what they were doing . At least, in theory...
The problem, and I emphasize the word problem, is that the Corvair of the early years - we're talking from 1960 to 1963 - hides a major design flaw . Its rear suspension, which is called "swing axles," has this annoying tendency to "fold" in certain situations. Basically, take a sharp turn, and your beautiful Corvair can decide to do a roller coaster without asking your opinion.
And the craziest part of all this? A mechanic, George Caramagna, had suggested installing a simple stabilizer bar to correct the problem. Estimated cost: a few dollars per car . Steering response? Nope. Too expensive. Go figure...
The Harvard Whistleblower
Enter our hero—or villain, depending on your point of view— Ralph Nader . Born in 1934 to a family of Lebanese immigrants, the guy grew up with the idea that David can beat Goliath. A Harvard graduate, a lawyer, but above all, obsessed with one fixed idea: car manufacturers don't give a damn about the safety of their customers.
In 1965, Nader was 31 years old and seething. He spent his days poring over accident reports, meeting with victims' families, and analyzing design flaws. And the Corvair, for him, was the perfect example of everything that was wrong with the American auto industry.
So he embarked on a crazy project: writing a book to denounce all this. "Unsafe at Any Speed" was published in November 1965, and the first chapter was entirely devoted to the Corvair, which he called a "one-car accident." Not diplomatic at all, our Ralph.
But be warned, I have to tell you something funny: Nader himself owned a yellow four-door Corvair ! Ironic, right? The guy who's going to burn this car down had one in his garage. You couldn't make this up.
GM brings out the big guns
When Nader's book started to make waves, General Motors executives weren't laughing at all. We're talking about the largest automaker in the world at the time. These people are used to solving their problems with millions of dollars and intensive lobbying.
But this is different. Nader isn't asking for money, he doesn't want to negotiate. He just wants GM to acknowledge that its cars can kill. This is unacceptable to the Detroit brass.
That's when GM made a decision that would go down in history as one of the biggest blunders in the auto industry . Instead of fixing the Corvair's flaws or calmly responding to the accusations, they decided to... destroy Ralph Nader.
Picture the scene: In GM's air-conditioned offices, executives in suits and ties decide to hire private investigators to tail this troublesome little lawyer. The operation begins in February 1966, just after Nader testifies before Congress on February 10.
And that fascinates me, because GM doesn't do things by halves. They tap Nader's phone, they film him constantly and - I love this part - they hire prostitutes to try to seduce him and compromise him ! You can imagine the briefing: "Okay, girls, your mission is to crack a Harvard lawyer who criticizes our cars." Complete nonsense.
Product placement
This Corvair story reminds me why I love vintage cars so much. Each model has its own story, its secrets, its dramas. That's exactly why I created my shop BernardMiniatures.fr.
I have over 1500 miniatures in stock, mostly 1/43 scale, with models that tell the story of the automobile from the 50s to the 90s. Well, I'm not a big site, so I often only have one or two pieces of each model, but that's also what makes it charming. I have Chevrolets of course, but also Citroëns, Peugeots, Renaults... a bit of everything.
Delivery is free from 75€ in France, and I make sure to wrap everything well with bubble wrap because these little cars break easily.
Go take a look at bernardminiatures.fr if you're interested - and you'll see, I have some American models from the 60s that are really worth a look.
Now, back to our spy story...
The scandal breaks
GM's covert operation could have continued for a long time if Nader hadn't been so smart. The guy realizes he's being followed . He notices the same cars in his rearview mirror, the same faces in the cafes he goes to. And those slightly over-enthusiastic women who "accidentally" approach him...
So Nader does what any self-respecting lawyer would do: he fights back. He starts documenting all this harassment, taking pictures, writing down license plates. GM thinks they're playing spy, but they're dealing with Harvard Law School .
And then the moment everyone was waiting for arrived: Nader went on the public offensive. He revealed the existence of this spying campaign in the media. The effect was devastating. Imagine the headlines: "GM spies on its critics"!
General Motors CEO James Roche finds himself summoned before the U.S. Senate. And there, under oath, he is forced to admit that yes, GM did hire private investigators to investigate Nader. The confession, live, in front of the entire country . The kind of moment that makes you want to hide under your desk.
GM publicly apologizes to Nader, but the damage is done. The company's image is destroyed. Overnight, GM goes from being a respected giant to an industrial thug .
Inside Revelations
But wait, because the revelations don't stop there. John DeLorean—yes, the gullwing-door guy—who was working at GM at the time, spills the beans in his book, "On A Clear Day You Can See GM."
According to DeLorean, Frank Winchell, one of Cole's team engineers, had rolled over one of the early Corvair prototypes . And he wasn't the only one! Other similar accidents followed during testing.
A fierce internal battle had begun. On one side was Ed Cole, obsessed with his project; on the other, several top engineers were sounding the alarm. But as DeLorean said, "Cole's mind was already made up." The Corvair would be released, period.
I always feel uncomfortable when I see stories where ego takes precedence over safety. These are human lives at stake after all...
The Corvair's Strange Defense
But hold on tight, because the story takes an unexpected turn. In 1962, three years before Nader's book , two of the greatest Formula 1 drivers in history came to testify... in favor of the Corvair!
Sir Stirling Moss and Juan Manuel Fangio - I've named two absolute racing legends - are arriving in an American court to defend this controversial car. These guys know rear-engined cars better than anyone . They went from front-engined cars to rear-engined cars in F1, they know what they're talking about.
Their argument? A rear-engined car, if you know how to drive it, is even better than a conventional car. The problem isn't the car, it's driver education .
And here, I have to admit, they're not entirely wrong. Take a Porsche 911 - rear-engined too - and give it to anyone to drive without explanation. There's a good chance it'll end badly. But no one is saying the 911 is dangerous , just that you have to learn to drive it.
Nader's response
Nader, however, is unfazed by these prestigious testimonials. His argument is simple: GM is selling this car to the general public, not to F1 drivers . Average Joes and Joes don't have Stirling Moss's training.
And then comes the most delicious episode of the whole affair. Nader sues GM for invasion of privacy and... he wins! GM has to pay him $425,000 —a huge sum at the time.
But be careful, this is where Nader shows he's not in this for the money. He uses all of that money to create the Center for the Study of Responsive Law , an organization that will continue to monitor industry practices. The guy is turning his lawsuit into a machine to fight corporate abuse.
Browse our selection of over 1,500 models. Browse through our various categories: French cars, foreign cars, sports & racing cars, professional vehicles, and vintage vehicles.
The political impact
The Corvair affair goes far beyond a simple dispute between a lawyer and a manufacturer. Just one year after the publication of "Unsafe at Any Speed," the U.S. Congress unanimously—and I emphasize the word unanimously—passed the National Traffic and Motor Vehicle Safety Act.
President Johnson signed the law into law during a ceremony at the White House on September 9, 1966. For the first time in American history, the government would control automobile safety . Gone were the days when automakers could do whatever they wanted without accountability.
This law is the forerunner of all modern automotive safety regulations. Airbags, ABS, ESP, crumple zones... all of these are direct offshoots of what Nader initiated in 1965. Not bad for a 31-year-old lawyer, eh?
The unexpected rehabilitation
But the story doesn't end there, and this is where it gets really interesting. In 1972, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration—the agency created following the 1966 law—published a report that... disputed Nader's claims!
According to this official report, the Corvair's rollover rate was no higher than that of comparable cars . The tight cornering behavior wasn't that abnormal. In short, the Corvair may not have been more dangerous than its competitors.
And besides, GM had already introduced a more advanced independent rear suspension in 1965 that completely solved the camber problems. The 1965-1969 Corvair was technically flawless .
So, was Nader right or wrong? I think the truth lies somewhere in between. The early Corvair did have flaws, but not necessarily more serious than other cars of the era . The real problem was GM's attitude toward criticism.
Who killed the Corvair?
And here's something that might surprise you: Nader didn't kill the Corvair ! Contrary to popular belief, GM had already stopped developing new models six months before "Unsafe at Any Speed" was published.
The Corvair was already doomed, not because of Nader's book, but because of multiple lawsuits and high-profile accidents. The most famous? Comedian Ernie Kovacs's fatal crash in 1962 , three years before Nader's book.
Besides, the redesigned 1965 Corvair had sold better than previous models. If GM had really wanted to save the Corvair, they could have . But they already had other plans in mind.
In reality, GM preferred to focus its efforts on more conventional and profitable cars. The Corvair had become a drag on the brand's image , regardless of Nader's criticism.
The legacy of a war
Today, when we look back on this case, we realize that everyone was a little right and a little wrong . Nader was right to criticize GM's cavalier attitude toward safety. GM was right to say that their engineers knew what they were doing technically.
But most importantly, this battle's legacy is what Nader says helped launch the modern consumer movement, with legislation on car safety, air pollution, and water pollution that "prevented millions of lives and tens of millions of injuries."
And frankly, while we can argue about the technical details of the Corvair, we can't deny that our cars are infinitely safer today than they were in 1965. And that's largely thanks to people like Nader who had the courage to say no to industrial giants.
The Corvair affair also teaches us something important about corporate power. When GM decided to spy on Nader rather than respond to his critics, they showed that even the largest companies can panic in the face of a single, determined man .
Epilogue: The Lesson of a Yellow Corvair
A few years ago, Nader's own Corvair—that famous yellow four-door—was used in track tests to verify his claims decades later. The verdict? The car did indeed handle peculiarly, but nothing insurmountable for a knowledgeable driver .
Ultimately, this story reminds us that automobiles are much more than mechanics . They're about politics, economics, and human psychology. A simple car can change history, trigger laws, and bring down leaders.
Free delivery from €75, carefully protected packages, and over 1,000 satisfied customers. Discover why collectors trust us.
The Corvair ultimately had a ten-year run, from 1960 to 1969. Not bad for a "dangerous" car , right? And today, collectors are snapping it up. It just goes to show that, over time, even scandals can become objects of nostalgia.
Nader, for his part, continues his fight for consumer protection at 90 years old. GM is still the giant we know, but with safety departments that are no longer joked about . And we drive cars that are infinitely safer than in 1965.
This Corvair story is ultimately one of a silent revolution . A revolution that began in a lawyer's garage with a yellow car and ended up changing the way cars are conceived worldwide. Not bad for a story about a "simple" defective car, don't you think?
